2026 年 9 月 12 日, the newly built 780 万 AUD Advanced Water Treatment Plant (AWTP) in Dubbo, New South Wales, Australia, has been energized and put into operation. Built adjacent to the existing sewage treatment plant, it treats up to 700 megalitres per year of effluent that would otherwise have been discharged. The core unit was invented by water treatment scientist Troy Warry and is described as the world's first titanium dioxide-based advanced oxidation system with the catalyst permanently immobilised inside the reactor while maintaining high photoactivity, with the energy efficiency for destroying recalcitrant pollutants claimed to be 16 times that of conventional systems. Wind farm developer Squadron Energy contributed 360 万 AUD in exchange for reclaimed water to build its three wind farms and a peaking station.
It Solves the Longstanding Problem of Advanced Oxidation
Advanced Oxidation (AOP) is not a new technology, but it has long been stuck on an engineering pain point: how to keep the catalyst inside the reactor.
Conventional titanium dioxide photocatalysis mostly uses suspended or supported catalysts. The former requires subsequent separation and recovery, while the latter is prone to detachment and deactivation under long-term scouring, leading to declining performance and secondary dosing costs. According to Warry, this is "the world's first titanium dioxide-based system with the catalyst permanently immobilised inside the reactor while still maintaining high photoactivity".
The direct results are:
- Drastically reduced chemical dosing — the catalyst no longer washes away with the water flow and requires no continuous replenishment, so "extremely powerful treatment chemistry can be achieved without continuously dosing large amounts of treatment chemicals".
- Faster reaction rates — by accelerating reaction kinetics, it destroys recalcitrant pollutants faster than conventional advanced oxidation, thereby significantly reducing energy consumption.
- Higher effluent quality — the inventor says the system "uses less energy, produces cleaner water, takes less time to destroy pollutants, and can sustain high flow rates every day over the long term".
- Trialled in three countries — the system was trialled and scaled up by Warry in Germany, Spain, and Norway, with Dubbo being its first application in Australia.
The Biggest Difference from Membrane Processes: Destroy, Not Reject
This is the point most worthy of attention from domestic peers.
The essence of membrane routes such as Reverse Osmosis is separation: "screening" pollutants out of the water, at the cost of producing a high-salinity concentrate stream. In inland areas, this concentrate often has no compliant, economical disposal outlet, becoming the final obstacle to closing the project loop.
Warry emphasizes that his system "attacks their chemical structure and tears the molecules apart", rather than "rejecting the pollutants and creating a concentrated waste stream". Treatable targets include pesticides, petroleum hydrocarbons, pharmaceutical residues, antibiotics, hormones, and other persistent organic compounds.
Professor Stuart Khan, Head of the School of Civil Engineering at the University of Sydney, offered a relatively measured third-party perspective in his assessment: he said the technology is "relatively rare", that he is not aware of similar technologies achieving full-scale application at municipal sewage plants, and that operating results would be needed to judge whether it makes a substantive difference; but he explicitly supports this route — "this is exactly the non-membrane-based alternative water reuse approach that inland communities need", because it does not leave behind hard-to-dispose saline waste as membrane processes do.
Where the 780 万 AUD Comes From: An Energy Company Pays for Reclaimed Water
The project's business model is also noteworthy.
- Total investment of AUD 780 万, built by Dubbo Regional Council and Squadron Energy through a public-private partnership (PPP).
- Squadron Energy contributes AUD 360 万, on the basis that it is allowed to draw Reclaimed Water for use in three wind farms and one peaking station within the construction area.
- The logic is clear — Squadron CEO Rob Wheals stated that this investment is intended to reduce demand on local water resources, so that "drinking water is left for drinking," while leaving a long-term asset for the community hosting its wind power projects.
- The local government's position — Dubbo Mayor Josh Black said this arrangement allows the city to "avoid choosing between drought and development," laying a long-term foundation for the city's water security.
Using a wind power project that consumes large amounts of construction water (concrete, dust suppression, camps) to give back to a Reclaimed Water plant is essentially front-loading the "certain demand of industrial users" as the project's investment source. This has direct reference value for water-scarce inland regions.
Approval still pending: the boundary of Reclaimed Water use
At present, the plant has been commissioned, but final approval for Reclaimed Water use in human-contact scenarios such as construction is expected to be completed by the end of the year. The council has commissioned the University of Newcastle to test the effluent and to explore other community uses, such as sports field irrigation.
This progress illustrates two things: first, Australia's tiered management of Reclaimed Water use remains strict — strong treatment capacity does not mean uses are automatically opened up; second, "build first, expand uses later" is a relatively robust path to implementation — first use non-contact applications (industrial, construction, landscape) to absorb capacity, then gradually pursue higher-grade uses.
Our assessment
TIANYI TECH has long provided wastewater treatment and Reclaimed Water Reuse system solutions for municipal and Industrial Park clients. We believe the value of the Dubbo project lies not in the figure of 16 times energy efficiency itself (this data comes from the inventor's account and still requires third-party long-term operational data for verification), but in that it provides a non-membrane reuse approach that bypasses concentrated brine. Water-scarce inland regions in China such as the northwest and north China are precisely stuck on concentrated brine disposal, which keeps the environmental assessment and operating costs of membrane projects persistently high. We suggest the industry pay attention to three points: first, whether catalyst immobilization can maintain activity over the long term under actual water quality conditions of high flux and high Suspended Solids, which determines whether it can move from "demonstration" to "standard configuration"; second, the feasibility of combining non-membrane and membrane processes — using Advanced Oxidation to reduce refractory organics and toxicity, then using low-pressure membranes for water quality control, may be more economical than a single route; third, front-loading the certain demand of industrial users as an investment source, exchanging long-term water supply agreements for construction funds, is a realistic lever for inland projects to break through funding constraints. The technology needs verification, but the direction is worth tracking.
About TIANYI TECH (TIANYI LIMITED): TIANYI TECH is deeply engaged in the field of wastewater treatment and Reclaimed Water Reuse, committed to providing efficient, low-carbon, and sustainable water treatment solutions for municipal and industrial clients.
Source: ABC News (2026 年 9 月 12 日, Australian Broadcasting Corporation), public comments by Professor Stuart Khan of the School of Civil Engineering, University of Sydney. The performance indicators in this article are from the inventor's account and are still pending third-party long-term operational verification. This article is a compilation of industry news for readers' reference.
Company News
2026-09-27